• Merci de copier-coller le message d'erreur qui s'affiche à l'écran, s'il y a lieu.

I think that the game should have ranked losers, for example the winner, then 2nd place, 3rd place, 4th place.

In the table this report is about, two players have 7 points and the other two players had much lower points. But there was only 1 winner and everyone else was tied for 2nd, when one loser was clearly better than the rest. For a one round game everyone should be ranked by how many points they scored.

This would help reflect a better ELO of players, as well as arena standings in games with more than 2 players.

• Veuillez expliquer ce que vous vouliez faire, ce que vous avez fait et ce qu'il s'est passé

• Quel est votre navigateur ?

• SVP copiez / collez ici le texte affiché en anglais au lieu de votre langue. Si vous disposez d'une impression écran du bug (bonne pratique), vous pouvez utiliser le service d'hébergement de votre choix (snipboard.io par exemple) pour l'uploader et copier/coller le lien ici. Ce texte est-il disponible dans le système de traduction ? Si oui, a-t-il été traduit depuis plus de 24 heures ?

I think that the game should have ranked losers, for example the winner, then 2nd place, 3rd place, 4th place.

In the table this report is about, two players have 7 points and the other two players had much lower points. But there was only 1 winner and everyone else was tied for 2nd, when one loser was clearly better than the rest. For a one round game everyone should be ranked by how many points they scored.

This would help reflect a better ELO of players, as well as arena standings in games with more than 2 players.

• Quel est votre navigateur ?

• Merci d'expliquer votre suggestion de manière précise et concise, de façon à ce qu'il soit aussi simple que possible de comprendre ce que vous voulez dire.

I think that the game should have ranked losers, for example the winner, then 2nd place, 3rd place, 4th place.

In the table this report is about, two players have 7 points and the other two players had much lower points. But there was only 1 winner and everyone else was tied for 2nd, when one loser was clearly better than the rest. For a one round game everyone should be ranked by how many points they scored.

This would help reflect a better ELO of players, as well as arena standings in games with more than 2 players.

• Quel est votre navigateur ?

• Qu'affichait l'écran lorsque vous avez été bloqué(e) (Un écran vierge ? Une partie de l'interface du jeu ? Un message d'erreur ?)

I think that the game should have ranked losers, for example the winner, then 2nd place, 3rd place, 4th place.

In the table this report is about, two players have 7 points and the other two players had much lower points. But there was only 1 winner and everyone else was tied for 2nd, when one loser was clearly better than the rest. For a one round game everyone should be ranked by how many points they scored.

This would help reflect a better ELO of players, as well as arena standings in games with more than 2 players.

• Quel est votre navigateur ?

• Quelle partie des règles n'a pas été respectée par l'adaptation BGA ?

I think that the game should have ranked losers, for example the winner, then 2nd place, 3rd place, 4th place.

In the table this report is about, two players have 7 points and the other two players had much lower points. But there was only 1 winner and everyone else was tied for 2nd, when one loser was clearly better than the rest. For a one round game everyone should be ranked by how many points they scored.

This would help reflect a better ELO of players, as well as arena standings in games with more than 2 players.

• La violation de règle est-elle visible dans le replay de la partie ? Si oui, à quel numéro de coup ?

• Quel est votre navigateur ?

• Quelle action de jeu vouliez-vous faire ?

I think that the game should have ranked losers, for example the winner, then 2nd place, 3rd place, 4th place.

In the table this report is about, two players have 7 points and the other two players had much lower points. But there was only 1 winner and everyone else was tied for 2nd, when one loser was clearly better than the rest. For a one round game everyone should be ranked by how many points they scored.

This would help reflect a better ELO of players, as well as arena standings in games with more than 2 players.

• Qu'avez-vous essayé de faire pour déclencher cette action de jeu ?

• Que s'est-il passé lorsque vous avez essayé de faire cela (message d'erreur, message dans la barre d'état du jeu...) ?

• Quel est votre navigateur ?

• À quelle étape de la partie le problème est-il apparu ? Quelles instructions le jeu affichait-il ?

I think that the game should have ranked losers, for example the winner, then 2nd place, 3rd place, 4th place.

In the table this report is about, two players have 7 points and the other two players had much lower points. But there was only 1 winner and everyone else was tied for 2nd, when one loser was clearly better than the rest. For a one round game everyone should be ranked by how many points they scored.

This would help reflect a better ELO of players, as well as arena standings in games with more than 2 players.

• Que s'est-il passé lorsque vous avez essayé de faire cette action de jeu (message d'erreur, message dans la barre d'état du jeu...) ?

• Quel est votre navigateur ?

• Veuillez décrire le problème d'affichage. Si vous disposez d'une impression écran du bug (bonne pratique), vous pouvez utiliser le service d'hébergement de votre choix (snipboard.io par exemple) pour l'uploader et copier/coller le lien ici.

I think that the game should have ranked losers, for example the winner, then 2nd place, 3rd place, 4th place.

In the table this report is about, two players have 7 points and the other two players had much lower points. But there was only 1 winner and everyone else was tied for 2nd, when one loser was clearly better than the rest. For a one round game everyone should be ranked by how many points they scored.

This would help reflect a better ELO of players, as well as arena standings in games with more than 2 players.

• Quel est votre navigateur ?

• SVP copiez / collez ici le texte affiché en anglais au lieu de votre langue. Si vous disposez d'une impression écran du bug (bonne pratique), vous pouvez utiliser le service d'hébergement de votre choix (snipboard.io par exemple) pour l'uploader et copier/coller le lien ici. Ce texte est-il disponible dans le système de traduction ? Si oui, a-t-il été traduit depuis plus de 24 heures ?

I think that the game should have ranked losers, for example the winner, then 2nd place, 3rd place, 4th place.

In the table this report is about, two players have 7 points and the other two players had much lower points. But there was only 1 winner and everyone else was tied for 2nd, when one loser was clearly better than the rest. For a one round game everyone should be ranked by how many points they scored.

This would help reflect a better ELO of players, as well as arena standings in games with more than 2 players.

• Quel est votre navigateur ?

• Merci d'expliquer votre suggestion de manière précise et concise, de façon à ce qu'il soit aussi simple que possible de comprendre ce que vous voulez dire.

I think that the game should have ranked losers, for example the winner, then 2nd place, 3rd place, 4th place.

In the table this report is about, two players have 7 points and the other two players had much lower points. But there was only 1 winner and everyone else was tied for 2nd, when one loser was clearly better than the rest. For a one round game everyone should be ranked by how many points they scored.

This would help reflect a better ELO of players, as well as arena standings in games with more than 2 players.

• Quel est votre navigateur ?