#14241: "ARENA mode players should be anonymous in team games, until the end of the game."
Quel est le sujet de ce rapport ?
Que s'est-il passé ? Merci de choisir ci-dessous
Que s'est-il passé ? Merci de choisir ci-dessous
Veuillez vérifier s'il existe déjà un rapport sur le même sujet
Si oui, veuillez VOTER pour ce rapport. Les rapports ayant le plus de votes auront la PRIORITÉ !
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Description détaillée
-
• Merci de copier-coller le message d'erreur qui s'affiche à l'écran, s'il y a lieu.
This suggestion is relevant only for team games (such as 5v5, 2v2v2v2, 1v1v1v1v1 and so on).
In a competitive environment, being temporarily anonymous while playing has various advantages:
- Harder for players to cheat and boost a certain player.
- Makes victory the player's only goal: otherwise some players may just focus on whoever is the highest rank, or on whoever beat them earlier, or on whoever gets a certain color, and so on.
- Makes ELO much more meaningful: because external factors that should be irrelevant are removed (a player's name, a player's country of birth, a player's ELO, a player's age etc), the ELO will become a much better objective representation of the actual skill level of a player.
- Makes players accept losses easier: because they know the only reason someone targeted them is that the other player thought it was the best move, and not because of external factors such as country, name etc etc.
Before the start of the match player identities can be shown, as long as they are not paired with the color they will be in-game.
After the game is over, every player identity should be revealed as well as ELO changes, just like it happens now. -
• Veuillez expliquer ce que vous vouliez faire, ce que vous avez fait et ce qu'il s'est passé
• Quel est votre navigateur ?
Irrelevant
-
• SVP copiez / collez ici le texte affiché en anglais au lieu de votre langue. Si vous disposez d'une impression écran du bug (bonne pratique), vous pouvez utiliser le service d'hébergement de votre choix (snipboard.io par exemple) pour l'uploader et copier/coller le lien ici. Ce texte est-il disponible dans le système de traduction ? Si oui, a-t-il été traduit depuis plus de 24 heures ?
This suggestion is relevant only for team games (such as 5v5, 2v2v2v2, 1v1v1v1v1 and so on).
In a competitive environment, being temporarily anonymous while playing has various advantages:
- Harder for players to cheat and boost a certain player.
- Makes victory the player's only goal: otherwise some players may just focus on whoever is the highest rank, or on whoever beat them earlier, or on whoever gets a certain color, and so on.
- Makes ELO much more meaningful: because external factors that should be irrelevant are removed (a player's name, a player's country of birth, a player's ELO, a player's age etc), the ELO will become a much better objective representation of the actual skill level of a player.
- Makes players accept losses easier: because they know the only reason someone targeted them is that the other player thought it was the best move, and not because of external factors such as country, name etc etc.
Before the start of the match player identities can be shown, as long as they are not paired with the color they will be in-game.
After the game is over, every player identity should be revealed as well as ELO changes, just like it happens now. • Quel est votre navigateur ?
Irrelevant
-
• Merci d'expliquer votre suggestion de manière précise et concise, de façon à ce qu'il soit aussi simple que possible de comprendre ce que vous voulez dire.
This suggestion is relevant only for team games (such as 5v5, 2v2v2v2, 1v1v1v1v1 and so on).
In a competitive environment, being temporarily anonymous while playing has various advantages:
- Harder for players to cheat and boost a certain player.
- Makes victory the player's only goal: otherwise some players may just focus on whoever is the highest rank, or on whoever beat them earlier, or on whoever gets a certain color, and so on.
- Makes ELO much more meaningful: because external factors that should be irrelevant are removed (a player's name, a player's country of birth, a player's ELO, a player's age etc), the ELO will become a much better objective representation of the actual skill level of a player.
- Makes players accept losses easier: because they know the only reason someone targeted them is that the other player thought it was the best move, and not because of external factors such as country, name etc etc.
Before the start of the match player identities can be shown, as long as they are not paired with the color they will be in-game.
After the game is over, every player identity should be revealed as well as ELO changes, just like it happens now. • Quel est votre navigateur ?
Irrelevant
-
• Qu'affichait l'écran lorsque vous avez été bloqué(e) (Un écran vierge ? Une partie de l'interface du jeu ? Un message d'erreur ?)
This suggestion is relevant only for team games (such as 5v5, 2v2v2v2, 1v1v1v1v1 and so on).
In a competitive environment, being temporarily anonymous while playing has various advantages:
- Harder for players to cheat and boost a certain player.
- Makes victory the player's only goal: otherwise some players may just focus on whoever is the highest rank, or on whoever beat them earlier, or on whoever gets a certain color, and so on.
- Makes ELO much more meaningful: because external factors that should be irrelevant are removed (a player's name, a player's country of birth, a player's ELO, a player's age etc), the ELO will become a much better objective representation of the actual skill level of a player.
- Makes players accept losses easier: because they know the only reason someone targeted them is that the other player thought it was the best move, and not because of external factors such as country, name etc etc.
Before the start of the match player identities can be shown, as long as they are not paired with the color they will be in-game.
After the game is over, every player identity should be revealed as well as ELO changes, just like it happens now. • Quel est votre navigateur ?
Irrelevant
-
• Quelle partie des règles n'a pas été respectée par l'adaptation BGA ?
This suggestion is relevant only for team games (such as 5v5, 2v2v2v2, 1v1v1v1v1 and so on).
In a competitive environment, being temporarily anonymous while playing has various advantages:
- Harder for players to cheat and boost a certain player.
- Makes victory the player's only goal: otherwise some players may just focus on whoever is the highest rank, or on whoever beat them earlier, or on whoever gets a certain color, and so on.
- Makes ELO much more meaningful: because external factors that should be irrelevant are removed (a player's name, a player's country of birth, a player's ELO, a player's age etc), the ELO will become a much better objective representation of the actual skill level of a player.
- Makes players accept losses easier: because they know the only reason someone targeted them is that the other player thought it was the best move, and not because of external factors such as country, name etc etc.
Before the start of the match player identities can be shown, as long as they are not paired with the color they will be in-game.
After the game is over, every player identity should be revealed as well as ELO changes, just like it happens now. -
• La violation de règle est-elle visible dans le replay de la partie ? Si oui, à quel numéro de coup ?
• Quel est votre navigateur ?
Irrelevant
-
• Quelle action de jeu vouliez-vous faire ?
This suggestion is relevant only for team games (such as 5v5, 2v2v2v2, 1v1v1v1v1 and so on).
In a competitive environment, being temporarily anonymous while playing has various advantages:
- Harder for players to cheat and boost a certain player.
- Makes victory the player's only goal: otherwise some players may just focus on whoever is the highest rank, or on whoever beat them earlier, or on whoever gets a certain color, and so on.
- Makes ELO much more meaningful: because external factors that should be irrelevant are removed (a player's name, a player's country of birth, a player's ELO, a player's age etc), the ELO will become a much better objective representation of the actual skill level of a player.
- Makes players accept losses easier: because they know the only reason someone targeted them is that the other player thought it was the best move, and not because of external factors such as country, name etc etc.
Before the start of the match player identities can be shown, as long as they are not paired with the color they will be in-game.
After the game is over, every player identity should be revealed as well as ELO changes, just like it happens now. -
• Qu'avez-vous essayé de faire pour déclencher cette action de jeu ?
-
• Que s'est-il passé lorsque vous avez essayé de faire cela (message d'erreur, message dans la barre d'état du jeu...) ?
• Quel est votre navigateur ?
Irrelevant
-
• À quelle étape de la partie le problème est-il apparu ? Quelles instructions le jeu affichait-il ?
This suggestion is relevant only for team games (such as 5v5, 2v2v2v2, 1v1v1v1v1 and so on).
In a competitive environment, being temporarily anonymous while playing has various advantages:
- Harder for players to cheat and boost a certain player.
- Makes victory the player's only goal: otherwise some players may just focus on whoever is the highest rank, or on whoever beat them earlier, or on whoever gets a certain color, and so on.
- Makes ELO much more meaningful: because external factors that should be irrelevant are removed (a player's name, a player's country of birth, a player's ELO, a player's age etc), the ELO will become a much better objective representation of the actual skill level of a player.
- Makes players accept losses easier: because they know the only reason someone targeted them is that the other player thought it was the best move, and not because of external factors such as country, name etc etc.
Before the start of the match player identities can be shown, as long as they are not paired with the color they will be in-game.
After the game is over, every player identity should be revealed as well as ELO changes, just like it happens now. -
• Que s'est-il passé lorsque vous avez essayé de faire cette action de jeu (message d'erreur, message dans la barre d'état du jeu...) ?
• Quel est votre navigateur ?
Irrelevant
-
• Veuillez décrire le problème d'affichage. Si vous disposez d'une impression écran du bug (bonne pratique), vous pouvez utiliser le service d'hébergement de votre choix (snipboard.io par exemple) pour l'uploader et copier/coller le lien ici.
This suggestion is relevant only for team games (such as 5v5, 2v2v2v2, 1v1v1v1v1 and so on).
In a competitive environment, being temporarily anonymous while playing has various advantages:
- Harder for players to cheat and boost a certain player.
- Makes victory the player's only goal: otherwise some players may just focus on whoever is the highest rank, or on whoever beat them earlier, or on whoever gets a certain color, and so on.
- Makes ELO much more meaningful: because external factors that should be irrelevant are removed (a player's name, a player's country of birth, a player's ELO, a player's age etc), the ELO will become a much better objective representation of the actual skill level of a player.
- Makes players accept losses easier: because they know the only reason someone targeted them is that the other player thought it was the best move, and not because of external factors such as country, name etc etc.
Before the start of the match player identities can be shown, as long as they are not paired with the color they will be in-game.
After the game is over, every player identity should be revealed as well as ELO changes, just like it happens now. • Quel est votre navigateur ?
Irrelevant
-
• SVP copiez / collez ici le texte affiché en anglais au lieu de votre langue. Si vous disposez d'une impression écran du bug (bonne pratique), vous pouvez utiliser le service d'hébergement de votre choix (snipboard.io par exemple) pour l'uploader et copier/coller le lien ici. Ce texte est-il disponible dans le système de traduction ? Si oui, a-t-il été traduit depuis plus de 24 heures ?
This suggestion is relevant only for team games (such as 5v5, 2v2v2v2, 1v1v1v1v1 and so on).
In a competitive environment, being temporarily anonymous while playing has various advantages:
- Harder for players to cheat and boost a certain player.
- Makes victory the player's only goal: otherwise some players may just focus on whoever is the highest rank, or on whoever beat them earlier, or on whoever gets a certain color, and so on.
- Makes ELO much more meaningful: because external factors that should be irrelevant are removed (a player's name, a player's country of birth, a player's ELO, a player's age etc), the ELO will become a much better objective representation of the actual skill level of a player.
- Makes players accept losses easier: because they know the only reason someone targeted them is that the other player thought it was the best move, and not because of external factors such as country, name etc etc.
Before the start of the match player identities can be shown, as long as they are not paired with the color they will be in-game.
After the game is over, every player identity should be revealed as well as ELO changes, just like it happens now. • Quel est votre navigateur ?
Irrelevant
-
• Merci d'expliquer votre suggestion de manière précise et concise, de façon à ce qu'il soit aussi simple que possible de comprendre ce que vous voulez dire.
This suggestion is relevant only for team games (such as 5v5, 2v2v2v2, 1v1v1v1v1 and so on).
In a competitive environment, being temporarily anonymous while playing has various advantages:
- Harder for players to cheat and boost a certain player.
- Makes victory the player's only goal: otherwise some players may just focus on whoever is the highest rank, or on whoever beat them earlier, or on whoever gets a certain color, and so on.
- Makes ELO much more meaningful: because external factors that should be irrelevant are removed (a player's name, a player's country of birth, a player's ELO, a player's age etc), the ELO will become a much better objective representation of the actual skill level of a player.
- Makes players accept losses easier: because they know the only reason someone targeted them is that the other player thought it was the best move, and not because of external factors such as country, name etc etc.
Before the start of the match player identities can be shown, as long as they are not paired with the color they will be in-game.
After the game is over, every player identity should be revealed as well as ELO changes, just like it happens now. • Quel est votre navigateur ?
Irrelevant
Historique du rapport de bug
Now, it is also not normally a problem to make a move on a "Turn Based" game and to go back to the start page, but in this instance, the person whom I was playing was online, and we began to play the game in real time. The next problem that occurred is that there is no prompt that an automatic "Real Time" game, whether "Arena Mode" or not, has started when you are currently playing another "Turn Based" game. If it is a "Simple Mode" game, then the game just won't start. However, if it is an "Arena Mode" game, it starts automatically, you are removed from the game, and receive penalties for abandoning the game.
I am including a screenshot of the notice that I received of my loss in Battle Sheep as soon as I finished my game of Nine Men's Morris.
imgur.com/a/rlUF4xm
There was no way for me to know that the game began, until I had already lost.
One of the primary goals of "Arena Mode" play is to foster an environment where people play games more freely. I assume that is the reason that players are not allowed to leave "Arena Mode" games. To prevent players from being able to screen their opponents.
There is, however, an alternative. If the names of players were not displayed until the game actually begins, then players would not be able to screen their opponents. This would allow the standard "Real-Time" game features to be implemented in "Arena Mode."
Currently for "Real-Time" games, if a player does not start the game, there is no penalty, because the game does not start. The same could be done in "Arena Mode." If a player does not choose to start their game within a short time period, they could be replaced with the next available player. If there are no other available players, then the table could just wait for the player to return.
Now, the other players also should not be penalized, if this turns out to be an extended period of time, so all players should be prompted to start the game again, if it takes more than a minute for the game to begin.
That is how I feel the problem should be resolved, but in the mean time, if you allow a player to go to a "Turn Based" game from the "Play Now" page with pending "Real Time" games, you would either prompt to cancel the games, or open the "Turn Based" game in a new tab.
Ajouter à ce rapport
- Un autre n° de table / n° de coup
- Appuyer sur F5 a-t-il résolu le problème ?
- Le problème est-il apparu plusieurs fois ? À chaque fois ? Aléatoirement ?
- Si vous disposez d'une impression écran du bug (bonne pratique), vous pouvez utiliser le service d'hébergement de votre choix (snipboard.io par exemple) pour l'uploader et copier/coller le lien ici.
