#149942: "Assign Losses Automatically"

• Merci de copier-coller le message d'erreur qui s'affiche à l'écran, s'il y a lieu.
(Not a bug, just a suggestion.) Currently the game pauses a lot to ask folks to pick which unit will take a loss in battle. But (unless I'm missing something) actually there's no need to do this in most cases because it's usually determined which type of unit has to take the loss, and there's no functional difference between different units in the same category. There are some times where players do have decisions to make, e.g. whether a highland or a non-Highland Metropolitan brigade will take a loss. But there's basically never a reason to take a loss on a Highland rather than another Metropolitan brigade, so even though this is technically a choice I don't think it needs to be on here when it'd slow things down. Which Indian unit to take as a loss sometimes does matter, e.g. in a multi-Year scenario you should preferably take as a loss a unit whose Village is going to be occupied at the start of next Year. So it'd be great to streamline this a bit. Also I'm not sure if the implementation currently always requires you to take losses on an already flipped unit, but 13.4 is clear that Reduced units have loss priority over Full in the same category, so that also removes the need for some decisions.

Thanks so much!
• Veuillez expliquer ce que vous vouliez faire, ce que vous avez fait et ce qu'il s'est passé
• Quel est votre navigateur ?
Google Chrome v131

• SVP copiez / collez ici le texte affiché en anglais au lieu de votre langue. Si vous avez une capture d'écran de ce bug (pensez-y !), vous pouvez utiliser Imgur.com pour la télécharger et copier-coller le lien ici.
(Not a bug, just a suggestion.) Currently the game pauses a lot to ask folks to pick which unit will take a loss in battle. But (unless I'm missing something) actually there's no need to do this in most cases because it's usually determined which type of unit has to take the loss, and there's no functional difference between different units in the same category. There are some times where players do have decisions to make, e.g. whether a highland or a non-Highland Metropolitan brigade will take a loss. But there's basically never a reason to take a loss on a Highland rather than another Metropolitan brigade, so even though this is technically a choice I don't think it needs to be on here when it'd slow things down. Which Indian unit to take as a loss sometimes does matter, e.g. in a multi-Year scenario you should preferably take as a loss a unit whose Village is going to be occupied at the start of next Year. So it'd be great to streamline this a bit. Also I'm not sure if the implementation currently always requires you to take losses on an already flipped unit, but 13.4 is clear that Reduced units have loss priority over Full in the same category, so that also removes the need for some decisions.

Thanks so much!
• Ce texte est-il disponible dans le système de traduction ? Si oui, a-t-il été traduit depuis plus de 24 heures ?
• Quel est votre navigateur ?
Google Chrome v131

• Merci d'expliquer votre suggestion de manière précise et concise, de façon à ce qu'il soit aussi simple que possible de comprendre ce que vous voulez dire.
(Not a bug, just a suggestion.) Currently the game pauses a lot to ask folks to pick which unit will take a loss in battle. But (unless I'm missing something) actually there's no need to do this in most cases because it's usually determined which type of unit has to take the loss, and there's no functional difference between different units in the same category. There are some times where players do have decisions to make, e.g. whether a highland or a non-Highland Metropolitan brigade will take a loss. But there's basically never a reason to take a loss on a Highland rather than another Metropolitan brigade, so even though this is technically a choice I don't think it needs to be on here when it'd slow things down. Which Indian unit to take as a loss sometimes does matter, e.g. in a multi-Year scenario you should preferably take as a loss a unit whose Village is going to be occupied at the start of next Year. So it'd be great to streamline this a bit. Also I'm not sure if the implementation currently always requires you to take losses on an already flipped unit, but 13.4 is clear that Reduced units have loss priority over Full in the same category, so that also removes the need for some decisions.

Thanks so much!
• Quel est votre navigateur ?
Google Chrome v131

• Qu'affichait l'écran lorsque vous avez été bloqué·e (Un écran vierge ? Une partie de l'interface du jeu ? Un message d'erreur ?)
(Not a bug, just a suggestion.) Currently the game pauses a lot to ask folks to pick which unit will take a loss in battle. But (unless I'm missing something) actually there's no need to do this in most cases because it's usually determined which type of unit has to take the loss, and there's no functional difference between different units in the same category. There are some times where players do have decisions to make, e.g. whether a highland or a non-Highland Metropolitan brigade will take a loss. But there's basically never a reason to take a loss on a Highland rather than another Metropolitan brigade, so even though this is technically a choice I don't think it needs to be on here when it'd slow things down. Which Indian unit to take as a loss sometimes does matter, e.g. in a multi-Year scenario you should preferably take as a loss a unit whose Village is going to be occupied at the start of next Year. So it'd be great to streamline this a bit. Also I'm not sure if the implementation currently always requires you to take losses on an already flipped unit, but 13.4 is clear that Reduced units have loss priority over Full in the same category, so that also removes the need for some decisions.

Thanks so much!
• Quel est votre navigateur ?
Google Chrome v131

• Quelle partie des règles n'a pas été respectée par l'adaptation BGA ?
(Not a bug, just a suggestion.) Currently the game pauses a lot to ask folks to pick which unit will take a loss in battle. But (unless I'm missing something) actually there's no need to do this in most cases because it's usually determined which type of unit has to take the loss, and there's no functional difference between different units in the same category. There are some times where players do have decisions to make, e.g. whether a highland or a non-Highland Metropolitan brigade will take a loss. But there's basically never a reason to take a loss on a Highland rather than another Metropolitan brigade, so even though this is technically a choice I don't think it needs to be on here when it'd slow things down. Which Indian unit to take as a loss sometimes does matter, e.g. in a multi-Year scenario you should preferably take as a loss a unit whose Village is going to be occupied at the start of next Year. So it'd be great to streamline this a bit. Also I'm not sure if the implementation currently always requires you to take losses on an already flipped unit, but 13.4 is clear that Reduced units have loss priority over Full in the same category, so that also removes the need for some decisions.

Thanks so much!
• La violation de règle est-elle visible dans le replay de la partie ? Si oui, à quel numéro de coup ?
• Quel est votre navigateur ?
Google Chrome v131

• Quelle action de jeu vouliez-vous faire ?
(Not a bug, just a suggestion.) Currently the game pauses a lot to ask folks to pick which unit will take a loss in battle. But (unless I'm missing something) actually there's no need to do this in most cases because it's usually determined which type of unit has to take the loss, and there's no functional difference between different units in the same category. There are some times where players do have decisions to make, e.g. whether a highland or a non-Highland Metropolitan brigade will take a loss. But there's basically never a reason to take a loss on a Highland rather than another Metropolitan brigade, so even though this is technically a choice I don't think it needs to be on here when it'd slow things down. Which Indian unit to take as a loss sometimes does matter, e.g. in a multi-Year scenario you should preferably take as a loss a unit whose Village is going to be occupied at the start of next Year. So it'd be great to streamline this a bit. Also I'm not sure if the implementation currently always requires you to take losses on an already flipped unit, but 13.4 is clear that Reduced units have loss priority over Full in the same category, so that also removes the need for some decisions.

Thanks so much!
• Qu'avez-vous essayé de faire pour déclencher cette action de jeu ?
• Que s'est-il passé lorsque vous avez essayé de faire cela (message d'erreur, message dans la barre d'état du jeu...) ?
• Quel est votre navigateur ?
Google Chrome v131

• À quelle étape de la partie le problème est-il apparu ? Quelles instructions le jeu affichait-il ?
(Not a bug, just a suggestion.) Currently the game pauses a lot to ask folks to pick which unit will take a loss in battle. But (unless I'm missing something) actually there's no need to do this in most cases because it's usually determined which type of unit has to take the loss, and there's no functional difference between different units in the same category. There are some times where players do have decisions to make, e.g. whether a highland or a non-Highland Metropolitan brigade will take a loss. But there's basically never a reason to take a loss on a Highland rather than another Metropolitan brigade, so even though this is technically a choice I don't think it needs to be on here when it'd slow things down. Which Indian unit to take as a loss sometimes does matter, e.g. in a multi-Year scenario you should preferably take as a loss a unit whose Village is going to be occupied at the start of next Year. So it'd be great to streamline this a bit. Also I'm not sure if the implementation currently always requires you to take losses on an already flipped unit, but 13.4 is clear that Reduced units have loss priority over Full in the same category, so that also removes the need for some decisions.

Thanks so much!
• Que s'est-il passé lorsque vous avez essayé de faire cette action de jeu (message d'erreur, message dans la barre d'état du jeu...) ?
• Quel est votre navigateur ?
Google Chrome v131

• Veuillez décrire le problème d'affichage. Si vous avez une capture d'écran de ce bug (pensez-y !), vous pouvez utiliser Imgur.com pour la télécharger et copier-coller le lien ici.
(Not a bug, just a suggestion.) Currently the game pauses a lot to ask folks to pick which unit will take a loss in battle. But (unless I'm missing something) actually there's no need to do this in most cases because it's usually determined which type of unit has to take the loss, and there's no functional difference between different units in the same category. There are some times where players do have decisions to make, e.g. whether a highland or a non-Highland Metropolitan brigade will take a loss. But there's basically never a reason to take a loss on a Highland rather than another Metropolitan brigade, so even though this is technically a choice I don't think it needs to be on here when it'd slow things down. Which Indian unit to take as a loss sometimes does matter, e.g. in a multi-Year scenario you should preferably take as a loss a unit whose Village is going to be occupied at the start of next Year. So it'd be great to streamline this a bit. Also I'm not sure if the implementation currently always requires you to take losses on an already flipped unit, but 13.4 is clear that Reduced units have loss priority over Full in the same category, so that also removes the need for some decisions.

Thanks so much!
• Quel est votre navigateur ?
Google Chrome v131

• SVP copiez / collez ici le texte affiché en anglais au lieu de votre langue. Si vous avez une capture d'écran de ce bug (pensez-y !), vous pouvez utiliser Imgur.com pour la télécharger et copier-coller le lien ici.
(Not a bug, just a suggestion.) Currently the game pauses a lot to ask folks to pick which unit will take a loss in battle. But (unless I'm missing something) actually there's no need to do this in most cases because it's usually determined which type of unit has to take the loss, and there's no functional difference between different units in the same category. There are some times where players do have decisions to make, e.g. whether a highland or a non-Highland Metropolitan brigade will take a loss. But there's basically never a reason to take a loss on a Highland rather than another Metropolitan brigade, so even though this is technically a choice I don't think it needs to be on here when it'd slow things down. Which Indian unit to take as a loss sometimes does matter, e.g. in a multi-Year scenario you should preferably take as a loss a unit whose Village is going to be occupied at the start of next Year. So it'd be great to streamline this a bit. Also I'm not sure if the implementation currently always requires you to take losses on an already flipped unit, but 13.4 is clear that Reduced units have loss priority over Full in the same category, so that also removes the need for some decisions.

Thanks so much!
• Ce texte est-il disponible dans le système de traduction ? Si oui, a-t-il été traduit depuis plus de 24 heures ?
• Quel est votre navigateur ?
Google Chrome v131

• Merci d'expliquer votre suggestion de manière précise et concise, de façon à ce qu'il soit aussi simple que possible de comprendre ce que vous voulez dire.
(Not a bug, just a suggestion.) Currently the game pauses a lot to ask folks to pick which unit will take a loss in battle. But (unless I'm missing something) actually there's no need to do this in most cases because it's usually determined which type of unit has to take the loss, and there's no functional difference between different units in the same category. There are some times where players do have decisions to make, e.g. whether a highland or a non-Highland Metropolitan brigade will take a loss. But there's basically never a reason to take a loss on a Highland rather than another Metropolitan brigade, so even though this is technically a choice I don't think it needs to be on here when it'd slow things down. Which Indian unit to take as a loss sometimes does matter, e.g. in a multi-Year scenario you should preferably take as a loss a unit whose Village is going to be occupied at the start of next Year. So it'd be great to streamline this a bit. Also I'm not sure if the implementation currently always requires you to take losses on an already flipped unit, but 13.4 is clear that Reduced units have loss priority over Full in the same category, so that also removes the need for some decisions.

Thanks so much!
• Quel est votre navigateur ?
Google Chrome v131

Quel est le sujet de ce rapport ?

Que s'est-il passé ? Merci de choisir ci-dessous

Que s'est-il passé ? Merci de choisir ci-dessous

Veuillez vérifier s'il existe déjà un rapport sur le même sujet

Description détaillée

Historique des rapports de bug

Ajouter à ce rapport

Changer le statut du rapport en :

Aide

Contribuer

Nous suivre