#158208: "2nd and 3rd place etc. scoring aren't reflective of who was 2nd best"
Quel est le sujet de ce rapport ?
Que s'est-il passé ? Merci de choisir ci-dessous
Que s'est-il passé ? Merci de choisir ci-dessous
Veuillez vérifier s'il existe déjà un rapport sur le même sujet
Si oui, veuillez VOTER pour ce rapport. Les rapports ayant le plus de votes auront la PRIORITÉ !
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Description détaillée
-
• Merci de copier-coller le message d'erreur qui s'affiche à l'écran, s'il y a lieu.
I propose that the score as evaluated at endgame should be separated from the money totals when one player ends the game.
The game can end very suddenly, and it seems not uncommon that a player could be set to win on the next turn, but have less current money (because it's tied up in goods) than a player who is 5 turns from winning but just sold a bunch of goods, so has more liquid assets.
The simplest solution would seem to be to dissociate the current money from the score, display the money rather than the official endgame score in the sidebar, and just give all non-winners joint 2nd. -
• Veuillez expliquer ce que vous vouliez faire, ce que vous avez fait et ce qu'il s'est passé
• Quel est votre navigateur ?
Mozilla v5
-
• SVP copiez / collez ici le texte affiché en anglais au lieu de votre langue. Si vous disposez d'une impression écran du bug (bonne pratique), vous pouvez utiliser le service d'hébergement de votre choix (snipboard.io par exemple) pour l'uploader et copier/coller le lien ici. Ce texte est-il disponible dans le système de traduction ? Si oui, a-t-il été traduit depuis plus de 24 heures ?
I propose that the score as evaluated at endgame should be separated from the money totals when one player ends the game.
The game can end very suddenly, and it seems not uncommon that a player could be set to win on the next turn, but have less current money (because it's tied up in goods) than a player who is 5 turns from winning but just sold a bunch of goods, so has more liquid assets.
The simplest solution would seem to be to dissociate the current money from the score, display the money rather than the official endgame score in the sidebar, and just give all non-winners joint 2nd. • Quel est votre navigateur ?
Mozilla v5
-
• Merci d'expliquer votre suggestion de manière précise et concise, de façon à ce qu'il soit aussi simple que possible de comprendre ce que vous voulez dire.
I propose that the score as evaluated at endgame should be separated from the money totals when one player ends the game.
The game can end very suddenly, and it seems not uncommon that a player could be set to win on the next turn, but have less current money (because it's tied up in goods) than a player who is 5 turns from winning but just sold a bunch of goods, so has more liquid assets.
The simplest solution would seem to be to dissociate the current money from the score, display the money rather than the official endgame score in the sidebar, and just give all non-winners joint 2nd. • Quel est votre navigateur ?
Mozilla v5
-
• Qu'affichait l'écran lorsque vous avez été bloqué(e) (Un écran vierge ? Une partie de l'interface du jeu ? Un message d'erreur ?)
I propose that the score as evaluated at endgame should be separated from the money totals when one player ends the game.
The game can end very suddenly, and it seems not uncommon that a player could be set to win on the next turn, but have less current money (because it's tied up in goods) than a player who is 5 turns from winning but just sold a bunch of goods, so has more liquid assets.
The simplest solution would seem to be to dissociate the current money from the score, display the money rather than the official endgame score in the sidebar, and just give all non-winners joint 2nd. • Quel est votre navigateur ?
Mozilla v5
-
• Quelle partie des règles n'a pas été respectée par l'adaptation BGA ?
I propose that the score as evaluated at endgame should be separated from the money totals when one player ends the game.
The game can end very suddenly, and it seems not uncommon that a player could be set to win on the next turn, but have less current money (because it's tied up in goods) than a player who is 5 turns from winning but just sold a bunch of goods, so has more liquid assets.
The simplest solution would seem to be to dissociate the current money from the score, display the money rather than the official endgame score in the sidebar, and just give all non-winners joint 2nd. -
• La violation de règle est-elle visible dans le replay de la partie ? Si oui, à quel numéro de coup ?
• Quel est votre navigateur ?
Mozilla v5
-
• Quelle action de jeu vouliez-vous faire ?
I propose that the score as evaluated at endgame should be separated from the money totals when one player ends the game.
The game can end very suddenly, and it seems not uncommon that a player could be set to win on the next turn, but have less current money (because it's tied up in goods) than a player who is 5 turns from winning but just sold a bunch of goods, so has more liquid assets.
The simplest solution would seem to be to dissociate the current money from the score, display the money rather than the official endgame score in the sidebar, and just give all non-winners joint 2nd. -
• Qu'avez-vous essayé de faire pour déclencher cette action de jeu ?
-
• Que s'est-il passé lorsque vous avez essayé de faire cela (message d'erreur, message dans la barre d'état du jeu...) ?
• Quel est votre navigateur ?
Mozilla v5
-
• À quelle étape de la partie le problème est-il apparu ? Quelles instructions le jeu affichait-il ?
I propose that the score as evaluated at endgame should be separated from the money totals when one player ends the game.
The game can end very suddenly, and it seems not uncommon that a player could be set to win on the next turn, but have less current money (because it's tied up in goods) than a player who is 5 turns from winning but just sold a bunch of goods, so has more liquid assets.
The simplest solution would seem to be to dissociate the current money from the score, display the money rather than the official endgame score in the sidebar, and just give all non-winners joint 2nd. -
• Que s'est-il passé lorsque vous avez essayé de faire cette action de jeu (message d'erreur, message dans la barre d'état du jeu...) ?
• Quel est votre navigateur ?
Mozilla v5
-
• Veuillez décrire le problème d'affichage. Si vous disposez d'une impression écran du bug (bonne pratique), vous pouvez utiliser le service d'hébergement de votre choix (snipboard.io par exemple) pour l'uploader et copier/coller le lien ici.
I propose that the score as evaluated at endgame should be separated from the money totals when one player ends the game.
The game can end very suddenly, and it seems not uncommon that a player could be set to win on the next turn, but have less current money (because it's tied up in goods) than a player who is 5 turns from winning but just sold a bunch of goods, so has more liquid assets.
The simplest solution would seem to be to dissociate the current money from the score, display the money rather than the official endgame score in the sidebar, and just give all non-winners joint 2nd. • Quel est votre navigateur ?
Mozilla v5
-
• SVP copiez / collez ici le texte affiché en anglais au lieu de votre langue. Si vous disposez d'une impression écran du bug (bonne pratique), vous pouvez utiliser le service d'hébergement de votre choix (snipboard.io par exemple) pour l'uploader et copier/coller le lien ici. Ce texte est-il disponible dans le système de traduction ? Si oui, a-t-il été traduit depuis plus de 24 heures ?
I propose that the score as evaluated at endgame should be separated from the money totals when one player ends the game.
The game can end very suddenly, and it seems not uncommon that a player could be set to win on the next turn, but have less current money (because it's tied up in goods) than a player who is 5 turns from winning but just sold a bunch of goods, so has more liquid assets.
The simplest solution would seem to be to dissociate the current money from the score, display the money rather than the official endgame score in the sidebar, and just give all non-winners joint 2nd. • Quel est votre navigateur ?
Mozilla v5
-
• Merci d'expliquer votre suggestion de manière précise et concise, de façon à ce qu'il soit aussi simple que possible de comprendre ce que vous voulez dire.
I propose that the score as evaluated at endgame should be separated from the money totals when one player ends the game.
The game can end very suddenly, and it seems not uncommon that a player could be set to win on the next turn, but have less current money (because it's tied up in goods) than a player who is 5 turns from winning but just sold a bunch of goods, so has more liquid assets.
The simplest solution would seem to be to dissociate the current money from the score, display the money rather than the official endgame score in the sidebar, and just give all non-winners joint 2nd. • Quel est votre navigateur ?
Mozilla v5
Historique du rapport de bug
A more complicated and probably divisive solution would be to add some additional points at the end to rank 2nd-3rd-4th by total goods + money or something, but that seems complicated and might be impossible to do well? But it's another idea.
Ajouter à ce rapport
- Un autre n° de table / n° de coup
- Appuyer sur F5 a-t-il résolu le problème ?
- Le problème est-il apparu plusieurs fois ? À chaque fois ? Aléatoirement ?
- Si vous disposez d'une impression écran du bug (bonne pratique), vous pouvez utiliser le service d'hébergement de votre choix (snipboard.io par exemple) pour l'uploader et copier/coller le lien ici.
