#21478: "Technology setup bug"
Quel est le sujet de ce rapport ?
Que s'est-il passé ? Merci de choisir ci-dessous
Que s'est-il passé ? Merci de choisir ci-dessous
Veuillez vérifier s'il existe déjà un rapport sur le même sujet
Si oui, veuillez VOTER pour ce rapport. Les rapports ayant le plus de votes auront la PRIORITÉ !
# | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
---|
Description détaillée
• Merci de copier-coller le message d'erreur qui s'affiche à l'écran, s'il y a lieu.
I've played seventy-one games of Teotihuacan on BGA and have noticed that the technologies that cost two gold never appear on the top row (and, vice versa, the one-gold technologies never appear on the bottom row).
The instructions state that six of the nine technologies should be randomly selected and then placed in ascending numerical order. This means that all four of the one-gold technologies could be used in a game and thus one of them (#07) would be placed on the bottom row. Also, all five of the two-gold technologies could be used and thus two of them (#09 and #11) would be placed on the top row.
Perhaps a bug in the code is causing the problem. Could you please allow the one-gold technologies to be placed in the bottom row and the two-gold technologies to be placed in the top row? Doing so will allow for greater replay value and new, exciting gameplay. Thank you!• Veuillez expliquer ce que vous vouliez faire, ce que vous avez fait et ce qu'il s'est passé
N/A• Quel est votre navigateur ?
Mozilla v5
• SVP copiez / collez ici le texte affiché en anglais au lieu de votre langue. Si vous avez une capture d'écran de ce bug (pensez-y !), vous pouvez utiliser Imgur.com pour la télécharger et copier-coller le lien ici.
I've played seventy-one games of Teotihuacan on BGA and have noticed that the technologies that cost two gold never appear on the top row (and, vice versa, the one-gold technologies never appear on the bottom row).
The instructions state that six of the nine technologies should be randomly selected and then placed in ascending numerical order. This means that all four of the one-gold technologies could be used in a game and thus one of them (#07) would be placed on the bottom row. Also, all five of the two-gold technologies could be used and thus two of them (#09 and #11) would be placed on the top row.
Perhaps a bug in the code is causing the problem. Could you please allow the one-gold technologies to be placed in the bottom row and the two-gold technologies to be placed in the top row? Doing so will allow for greater replay value and new, exciting gameplay. Thank you!• Ce texte est-il disponible dans le système de traduction ? Si oui, a-t-il été traduit depuis plus de 24 heures ?
N/A• Quel est votre navigateur ?
Mozilla v5
• Merci d'expliquer votre suggestion de manière précise et concise, de façon à ce qu'il soit aussi simple que possible de comprendre ce que vous voulez dire.
I've played seventy-one games of Teotihuacan on BGA and have noticed that the technologies that cost two gold never appear on the top row (and, vice versa, the one-gold technologies never appear on the bottom row).
The instructions state that six of the nine technologies should be randomly selected and then placed in ascending numerical order. This means that all four of the one-gold technologies could be used in a game and thus one of them (#07) would be placed on the bottom row. Also, all five of the two-gold technologies could be used and thus two of them (#09 and #11) would be placed on the top row.
Perhaps a bug in the code is causing the problem. Could you please allow the one-gold technologies to be placed in the bottom row and the two-gold technologies to be placed in the top row? Doing so will allow for greater replay value and new, exciting gameplay. Thank you!• Quel est votre navigateur ?
Mozilla v5
• Qu'était-il affiché à l'écran lorsque vous avez été bloqué·e (Écran vierge ? Une partie de l'interface de jeu ? Un message d'erreur ?)
I've played seventy-one games of Teotihuacan on BGA and have noticed that the technologies that cost two gold never appear on the top row (and, vice versa, the one-gold technologies never appear on the bottom row).
The instructions state that six of the nine technologies should be randomly selected and then placed in ascending numerical order. This means that all four of the one-gold technologies could be used in a game and thus one of them (#07) would be placed on the bottom row. Also, all five of the two-gold technologies could be used and thus two of them (#09 and #11) would be placed on the top row.
Perhaps a bug in the code is causing the problem. Could you please allow the one-gold technologies to be placed in the bottom row and the two-gold technologies to be placed in the top row? Doing so will allow for greater replay value and new, exciting gameplay. Thank you!• Quel est votre navigateur ?
Mozilla v5
• Quelle partie des règles n'a pas été respectée par l'adaptation BGA
I've played seventy-one games of Teotihuacan on BGA and have noticed that the technologies that cost two gold never appear on the top row (and, vice versa, the one-gold technologies never appear on the bottom row).
The instructions state that six of the nine technologies should be randomly selected and then placed in ascending numerical order. This means that all four of the one-gold technologies could be used in a game and thus one of them (#07) would be placed on the bottom row. Also, all five of the two-gold technologies could be used and thus two of them (#09 and #11) would be placed on the top row.
Perhaps a bug in the code is causing the problem. Could you please allow the one-gold technologies to be placed in the bottom row and the two-gold technologies to be placed in the top row? Doing so will allow for greater replay value and new, exciting gameplay. Thank you!• La violation de règle est-elle visible dans le replay de la partie ? Si oui, à quel numéro de coup ?
N/A• Quel est votre navigateur ?
Mozilla v5
• Quelle action de jeu vouliez-vous faire ?
I've played seventy-one games of Teotihuacan on BGA and have noticed that the technologies that cost two gold never appear on the top row (and, vice versa, the one-gold technologies never appear on the bottom row).
The instructions state that six of the nine technologies should be randomly selected and then placed in ascending numerical order. This means that all four of the one-gold technologies could be used in a game and thus one of them (#07) would be placed on the bottom row. Also, all five of the two-gold technologies could be used and thus two of them (#09 and #11) would be placed on the top row.
Perhaps a bug in the code is causing the problem. Could you please allow the one-gold technologies to be placed in the bottom row and the two-gold technologies to be placed in the top row? Doing so will allow for greater replay value and new, exciting gameplay. Thank you!• Qu'essayez-vous de faire pour déclencher cette action de jeu ?
N/A• Que se passe-t-il lorsque vous essayez de faire cela (message d'erreur, message de la barre d'état du jeu, ...) ?
• Quel est votre navigateur ?
Mozilla v5
• À quelle étape de la partie le problème est-il apparu (quel était le texte d'instruction du jeu) ?
I've played seventy-one games of Teotihuacan on BGA and have noticed that the technologies that cost two gold never appear on the top row (and, vice versa, the one-gold technologies never appear on the bottom row).
The instructions state that six of the nine technologies should be randomly selected and then placed in ascending numerical order. This means that all four of the one-gold technologies could be used in a game and thus one of them (#07) would be placed on the bottom row. Also, all five of the two-gold technologies could be used and thus two of them (#09 and #11) would be placed on the top row.
Perhaps a bug in the code is causing the problem. Could you please allow the one-gold technologies to be placed in the bottom row and the two-gold technologies to be placed in the top row? Doing so will allow for greater replay value and new, exciting gameplay. Thank you!• Que se passe-t-il lorsque vous essayez de faire une action de jeu (message d'erreur, message de la barre d'état du jeu, ...) ?
N/A• Quel est votre navigateur ?
Mozilla v5
• Veuillez décrire le problème d'affichage. Si vous avez une capture d'écran de ce bug (pensez-y !), vous pouvez utiliser Imgur.com pour la télécharger et copier-coller le lien ici.
I've played seventy-one games of Teotihuacan on BGA and have noticed that the technologies that cost two gold never appear on the top row (and, vice versa, the one-gold technologies never appear on the bottom row).
The instructions state that six of the nine technologies should be randomly selected and then placed in ascending numerical order. This means that all four of the one-gold technologies could be used in a game and thus one of them (#07) would be placed on the bottom row. Also, all five of the two-gold technologies could be used and thus two of them (#09 and #11) would be placed on the top row.
Perhaps a bug in the code is causing the problem. Could you please allow the one-gold technologies to be placed in the bottom row and the two-gold technologies to be placed in the top row? Doing so will allow for greater replay value and new, exciting gameplay. Thank you!• Quel est votre navigateur ?
Mozilla v5
• SVP copiez / collez ici le texte affiché en anglais au lieu de votre langue. Si vous avez une capture d'écran de ce bug (pensez-y !), vous pouvez utiliser Imgur.com pour la télécharger et copier-coller le lien ici.
I've played seventy-one games of Teotihuacan on BGA and have noticed that the technologies that cost two gold never appear on the top row (and, vice versa, the one-gold technologies never appear on the bottom row).
The instructions state that six of the nine technologies should be randomly selected and then placed in ascending numerical order. This means that all four of the one-gold technologies could be used in a game and thus one of them (#07) would be placed on the bottom row. Also, all five of the two-gold technologies could be used and thus two of them (#09 and #11) would be placed on the top row.
Perhaps a bug in the code is causing the problem. Could you please allow the one-gold technologies to be placed in the bottom row and the two-gold technologies to be placed in the top row? Doing so will allow for greater replay value and new, exciting gameplay. Thank you!• Ce texte est-il disponible dans le système de traduction ? Si oui, a-t-il été traduit depuis plus de 24 heures ?
N/A• Quel est votre navigateur ?
Mozilla v5
• Merci d'expliquer votre suggestion de manière précise et concise, de façon à ce qu'il soit aussi simple que possible de comprendre ce que vous voulez dire.
I've played seventy-one games of Teotihuacan on BGA and have noticed that the technologies that cost two gold never appear on the top row (and, vice versa, the one-gold technologies never appear on the bottom row).
The instructions state that six of the nine technologies should be randomly selected and then placed in ascending numerical order. This means that all four of the one-gold technologies could be used in a game and thus one of them (#07) would be placed on the bottom row. Also, all five of the two-gold technologies could be used and thus two of them (#09 and #11) would be placed on the top row.
Perhaps a bug in the code is causing the problem. Could you please allow the one-gold technologies to be placed in the bottom row and the two-gold technologies to be placed in the top row? Doing so will allow for greater replay value and new, exciting gameplay. Thank you!• Quel est votre navigateur ?
Mozilla v5
Historique des rapports de bug
It appears to be as the report describes.
The code first chooses one of the 1-gold tiles to exclude, and places the remaining ones in row 1.
Then it chooses two of the 2-gold tiles to exclude, and places the remaining ones in row 2.
Instead it should do something like the following:
* Select 6 tiles, and sort them.
* Place the first 3 tiles in row 1.
* Place the last 3 tiles in row 2.
github.com/salty-horse/bga-teotihuacan/commit/bug_21478
I'm working on a fix.
Ajouter à ce rapport
- Un autre n° de table / n° de coup
- La touche F5 a-t-elle résolu le problème ?
- Le problème est-il apparu plusieurs fois ? À chaque fois ? Aléatoirement ?
- Si vous avez une capture d'écran de ce bug (pensez-y !), vous pouvez utiliser Imgur.com pour la télécharger et copier-coller le lien ici.