#77164: "Defence Blocking Cost"
Quel est le sujet de ce rapport ?
Que s'est-il passé ? Merci de choisir ci-dessous
Que s'est-il passé ? Merci de choisir ci-dessous
Veuillez vérifier s'il existe déjà un rapport sur le même sujet
Si oui, veuillez VOTER pour ce rapport. Les rapports ayant le plus de votes auront la PRIORITÉ !
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Description détaillée
-
• Merci de copier-coller le message d'erreur qui s'affiche à l'écran, s'il y a lieu.
It's not too bad on the spells, but with the monsters, the defence shield is over the cost so it's difficult to see what it originally cost, especially if the monster is depleted from the central pool.
Depending on how you've focused your symbols, e.g. maybe you have not many cards which use salt, it's important to know what that card would cost to replenish if you chose to take shields from that creature to defend, so if I know it costs salt in this example maybe I want to make sure to take shields from it first so I have better options if I roll salt however if it does NOT cost salt then maybe I want to take shields from a salt costing defence, or something similar... -
• Veuillez expliquer ce que vous vouliez faire, ce que vous avez fait et ce qu'il s'est passé
• Quel est votre navigateur ?
Google Chrome v107
-
• SVP copiez / collez ici le texte affiché en anglais au lieu de votre langue. Si vous disposez d'une impression écran du bug (bonne pratique), vous pouvez utiliser le service d'hébergement de votre choix (snipboard.io par exemple) pour la télécharger et copier/coller le lien ici. Ce texte est-il disponible dans le système de traduction ? Si oui, a-t-il été traduit depuis plus de 24 heures ?
It's not too bad on the spells, but with the monsters, the defence shield is over the cost so it's difficult to see what it originally cost, especially if the monster is depleted from the central pool.
Depending on how you've focused your symbols, e.g. maybe you have not many cards which use salt, it's important to know what that card would cost to replenish if you chose to take shields from that creature to defend, so if I know it costs salt in this example maybe I want to make sure to take shields from it first so I have better options if I roll salt however if it does NOT cost salt then maybe I want to take shields from a salt costing defence, or something similar... • Quel est votre navigateur ?
Google Chrome v107
-
• Merci d'expliquer votre suggestion de manière précise et concise, de façon à ce qu'il soit aussi simple que possible de comprendre ce que vous voulez dire.
It's not too bad on the spells, but with the monsters, the defence shield is over the cost so it's difficult to see what it originally cost, especially if the monster is depleted from the central pool.
Depending on how you've focused your symbols, e.g. maybe you have not many cards which use salt, it's important to know what that card would cost to replenish if you chose to take shields from that creature to defend, so if I know it costs salt in this example maybe I want to make sure to take shields from it first so I have better options if I roll salt however if it does NOT cost salt then maybe I want to take shields from a salt costing defence, or something similar... • Quel est votre navigateur ?
Google Chrome v107
-
• Qu'affichait l'écran lorsque vous avez été bloqué(e) (Un écran vierge ? Une partie de l'interface du jeu ? Un message d'erreur ?)
It's not too bad on the spells, but with the monsters, the defence shield is over the cost so it's difficult to see what it originally cost, especially if the monster is depleted from the central pool.
Depending on how you've focused your symbols, e.g. maybe you have not many cards which use salt, it's important to know what that card would cost to replenish if you chose to take shields from that creature to defend, so if I know it costs salt in this example maybe I want to make sure to take shields from it first so I have better options if I roll salt however if it does NOT cost salt then maybe I want to take shields from a salt costing defence, or something similar... • Quel est votre navigateur ?
Google Chrome v107
-
• Quelle partie des règles n'a pas été respectée par l'adaptation BGA ?
It's not too bad on the spells, but with the monsters, the defence shield is over the cost so it's difficult to see what it originally cost, especially if the monster is depleted from the central pool.
Depending on how you've focused your symbols, e.g. maybe you have not many cards which use salt, it's important to know what that card would cost to replenish if you chose to take shields from that creature to defend, so if I know it costs salt in this example maybe I want to make sure to take shields from it first so I have better options if I roll salt however if it does NOT cost salt then maybe I want to take shields from a salt costing defence, or something similar... -
• La violation de règle est-elle visible dans le replay de la partie ? Si oui, à quel numéro de coup ?
• Quel est votre navigateur ?
Google Chrome v107
-
• Quelle action de jeu vouliez-vous faire ?
It's not too bad on the spells, but with the monsters, the defence shield is over the cost so it's difficult to see what it originally cost, especially if the monster is depleted from the central pool.
Depending on how you've focused your symbols, e.g. maybe you have not many cards which use salt, it's important to know what that card would cost to replenish if you chose to take shields from that creature to defend, so if I know it costs salt in this example maybe I want to make sure to take shields from it first so I have better options if I roll salt however if it does NOT cost salt then maybe I want to take shields from a salt costing defence, or something similar... -
• Qu'avez-vous essayé de faire pour déclencher cette action de jeu ?
-
• Que s'est-il passé lorsque vous avez essayé de faire cela (message d'erreur, message dans la barre d'état du jeu...) ?
• Quel est votre navigateur ?
Google Chrome v107
-
• À quelle étape de la partie le problème est-il apparu ? Quelles instructions le jeu affichait-il ?
It's not too bad on the spells, but with the monsters, the defence shield is over the cost so it's difficult to see what it originally cost, especially if the monster is depleted from the central pool.
Depending on how you've focused your symbols, e.g. maybe you have not many cards which use salt, it's important to know what that card would cost to replenish if you chose to take shields from that creature to defend, so if I know it costs salt in this example maybe I want to make sure to take shields from it first so I have better options if I roll salt however if it does NOT cost salt then maybe I want to take shields from a salt costing defence, or something similar... -
• Que s'est-il passé lorsque vous avez essayé de faire cette action de jeu (message d'erreur, message dans la barre d'état du jeu...) ?
• Quel est votre navigateur ?
Google Chrome v107
-
• Veuillez décrire le problème d'affichage. Si vous disposez d'une impression écran du bug (bonne pratique), vous pouvez utiliser le service d'hébergement de votre choix (snipboard.io par exemple) pour la télécharger et copier/coller le lien ici.
It's not too bad on the spells, but with the monsters, the defence shield is over the cost so it's difficult to see what it originally cost, especially if the monster is depleted from the central pool.
Depending on how you've focused your symbols, e.g. maybe you have not many cards which use salt, it's important to know what that card would cost to replenish if you chose to take shields from that creature to defend, so if I know it costs salt in this example maybe I want to make sure to take shields from it first so I have better options if I roll salt however if it does NOT cost salt then maybe I want to take shields from a salt costing defence, or something similar... • Quel est votre navigateur ?
Google Chrome v107
-
• SVP copiez / collez ici le texte affiché en anglais au lieu de votre langue. Si vous disposez d'une impression écran du bug (bonne pratique), vous pouvez utiliser le service d'hébergement de votre choix (snipboard.io par exemple) pour la télécharger et copier/coller le lien ici. Ce texte est-il disponible dans le système de traduction ? Si oui, a-t-il été traduit depuis plus de 24 heures ?
It's not too bad on the spells, but with the monsters, the defence shield is over the cost so it's difficult to see what it originally cost, especially if the monster is depleted from the central pool.
Depending on how you've focused your symbols, e.g. maybe you have not many cards which use salt, it's important to know what that card would cost to replenish if you chose to take shields from that creature to defend, so if I know it costs salt in this example maybe I want to make sure to take shields from it first so I have better options if I roll salt however if it does NOT cost salt then maybe I want to take shields from a salt costing defence, or something similar... • Quel est votre navigateur ?
Google Chrome v107
-
• Merci d'expliquer votre suggestion de manière précise et concise, de façon à ce qu'il soit aussi simple que possible de comprendre ce que vous voulez dire.
It's not too bad on the spells, but with the monsters, the defence shield is over the cost so it's difficult to see what it originally cost, especially if the monster is depleted from the central pool.
Depending on how you've focused your symbols, e.g. maybe you have not many cards which use salt, it's important to know what that card would cost to replenish if you chose to take shields from that creature to defend, so if I know it costs salt in this example maybe I want to make sure to take shields from it first so I have better options if I roll salt however if it does NOT cost salt then maybe I want to take shields from a salt costing defence, or something similar... • Quel est votre navigateur ?
Google Chrome v107
Historique du rapport de bug
Your bug has probably been fixed already, or was linked to a temporary failure of BGA service.
In any case, when filling a bug report, make sure to have an explicit title linked to the incident (ex: with error message), so other players can recognize it and vote for it.
Ajouter à ce rapport
- Un autre n° de table / n° de coup
- Appuyer sur F5 a-t-il résolu le problème ?
- Le problème est-il apparu plusieurs fois ? À chaque fois ? Aléatoirement ?
- Si vous disposez d'une impression écran du bug (bonne pratique), vous pouvez utiliser le service d'hébergement de votre choix (snipboard.io par exemple) pour la télécharger et copier/coller le lien ici.
