• Merci de copier-coller le message d'erreur qui s'affiche à l'écran, s'il y a lieu.

There are scenarios that make it very hard for new players to learn to enjoy the game fully because they are unlucky to choose the scenario that is better fit for an expert player. As a common result - a new player judges the game based on their poor experience of their first play of a very tough scenario that they are ill equiped to play, let alone win and to fully enjoy the playing experience.

There are two reasons for this to happen:

1. The scenario pertains to an expansion with sophisticated rules that are not very obvious (for example, Pacific scenario rules of extra dice for Japanes infantry unit in full strength and their ability to compbat close quarters even after a 2hex move, extra unit to command for Marines rule, Commissar chip rule for Soviet scenarios - these can make a new player's experience miserable if they do not know yet what they are up against).
2. Some scenarios, even without sophisticated rules, are built to challenge expert players. A good examples are First Assualt Wave and Sidi Rezegh Airfield. These two scenarios offer very poor winning chances for allies.

A common result of a new player exposed to such scenarios, especially when playing against a much stronger and more experience opponent, is a humiliating defeat that could upset a new player very much and lead her to believe that the game is rigged and bad in general. Hence poor conversion.

On the contrary, should a new player build their experience up by playing enough games on either basic scenarios (i.e. that do not have sophisticated rules on them) or scenarios that offer a balanced win-lose ratio, they can enjoy their play more while learning the ropes and maturing to be challenged by tougher scenarios when the time comes.

Solution

Mark up tough scenarios with 'Expert Scenario' tag that can be assigned to a scenario either manually by the game moderator or based on automatic rules such as:

- The win-lose ratio is worse than for example 3:7 (3 out of 10 wins versus 7 out of 10 wins for sides).
- A scenario has sophisticated rules such as:
-- Japanese Imperial Army rules
-- Marines rules.
-- Commissar chip rules.
-- Blitz rules.
-- And so on (the list of rules affecting the tag can be configured and adjusted).

Once a scenario has an 'Expert Scenario' tag assigned to it, the following is true:

- When a player selects a scenario to play, they can see the tag and explore the meaning of it by for example clicking on info icon that explains the reason behind the tag.
- When accepting a table with a tough scenario, a new player (as defined for example as a player with less than 20 games played) is shown a warning message that reads something like this:

'Hey commander! You are about to play an expert scenario. That means that this scenario either has specific rules that enahnce gameplay or is very tough to win for one of the sides. You are still a novice player and choosing this scenario could be quite challenging for you especially against a stronger opponent and might prevent you from enjoying the play in full. Are you sure you want to continue?'

While this warning could cut down the number of games played due to scaring off some unsure players, it could also cut down on the number of poorly experienced plays and therefore increase the overall satisfaction with the game and presumably increase new players to experienced players convrsion rate.

• Veuillez expliquer ce que vous vouliez faire, ce que vous avez fait et ce qu'il s'est passé

• Quel est votre navigateur ?

• SVP copiez / collez ici le texte affiché en anglais au lieu de votre langue. Si vous disposez d'une impression écran du bug (bonne pratique), vous pouvez utiliser le service d'hébergement de votre choix (snipboard.io par exemple) pour l'uploader et copier/coller le lien ici. Ce texte est-il disponible dans le système de traduction ? Si oui, a-t-il été traduit depuis plus de 24 heures ?

There are scenarios that make it very hard for new players to learn to enjoy the game fully because they are unlucky to choose the scenario that is better fit for an expert player. As a common result - a new player judges the game based on their poor experience of their first play of a very tough scenario that they are ill equiped to play, let alone win and to fully enjoy the playing experience.

There are two reasons for this to happen:

1. The scenario pertains to an expansion with sophisticated rules that are not very obvious (for example, Pacific scenario rules of extra dice for Japanes infantry unit in full strength and their ability to compbat close quarters even after a 2hex move, extra unit to command for Marines rule, Commissar chip rule for Soviet scenarios - these can make a new player's experience miserable if they do not know yet what they are up against).
2. Some scenarios, even without sophisticated rules, are built to challenge expert players. A good examples are First Assualt Wave and Sidi Rezegh Airfield. These two scenarios offer very poor winning chances for allies.

A common result of a new player exposed to such scenarios, especially when playing against a much stronger and more experience opponent, is a humiliating defeat that could upset a new player very much and lead her to believe that the game is rigged and bad in general. Hence poor conversion.

On the contrary, should a new player build their experience up by playing enough games on either basic scenarios (i.e. that do not have sophisticated rules on them) or scenarios that offer a balanced win-lose ratio, they can enjoy their play more while learning the ropes and maturing to be challenged by tougher scenarios when the time comes.

Solution

Mark up tough scenarios with 'Expert Scenario' tag that can be assigned to a scenario either manually by the game moderator or based on automatic rules such as:

- The win-lose ratio is worse than for example 3:7 (3 out of 10 wins versus 7 out of 10 wins for sides).
- A scenario has sophisticated rules such as:
-- Japanese Imperial Army rules
-- Marines rules.
-- Commissar chip rules.
-- Blitz rules.
-- And so on (the list of rules affecting the tag can be configured and adjusted).

Once a scenario has an 'Expert Scenario' tag assigned to it, the following is true:

- When a player selects a scenario to play, they can see the tag and explore the meaning of it by for example clicking on info icon that explains the reason behind the tag.
- When accepting a table with a tough scenario, a new player (as defined for example as a player with less than 20 games played) is shown a warning message that reads something like this:

'Hey commander! You are about to play an expert scenario. That means that this scenario either has specific rules that enahnce gameplay or is very tough to win for one of the sides. You are still a novice player and choosing this scenario could be quite challenging for you especially against a stronger opponent and might prevent you from enjoying the play in full. Are you sure you want to continue?'

While this warning could cut down the number of games played due to scaring off some unsure players, it could also cut down on the number of poorly experienced plays and therefore increase the overall satisfaction with the game and presumably increase new players to experienced players convrsion rate.

• Quel est votre navigateur ?

• Merci d'expliquer votre suggestion de manière précise et concise, de façon à ce qu'il soit aussi simple que possible de comprendre ce que vous voulez dire.

There are scenarios that make it very hard for new players to learn to enjoy the game fully because they are unlucky to choose the scenario that is better fit for an expert player. As a common result - a new player judges the game based on their poor experience of their first play of a very tough scenario that they are ill equiped to play, let alone win and to fully enjoy the playing experience.

There are two reasons for this to happen:

1. The scenario pertains to an expansion with sophisticated rules that are not very obvious (for example, Pacific scenario rules of extra dice for Japanes infantry unit in full strength and their ability to compbat close quarters even after a 2hex move, extra unit to command for Marines rule, Commissar chip rule for Soviet scenarios - these can make a new player's experience miserable if they do not know yet what they are up against).
2. Some scenarios, even without sophisticated rules, are built to challenge expert players. A good examples are First Assualt Wave and Sidi Rezegh Airfield. These two scenarios offer very poor winning chances for allies.

A common result of a new player exposed to such scenarios, especially when playing against a much stronger and more experience opponent, is a humiliating defeat that could upset a new player very much and lead her to believe that the game is rigged and bad in general. Hence poor conversion.

On the contrary, should a new player build their experience up by playing enough games on either basic scenarios (i.e. that do not have sophisticated rules on them) or scenarios that offer a balanced win-lose ratio, they can enjoy their play more while learning the ropes and maturing to be challenged by tougher scenarios when the time comes.

Solution

Mark up tough scenarios with 'Expert Scenario' tag that can be assigned to a scenario either manually by the game moderator or based on automatic rules such as:

- The win-lose ratio is worse than for example 3:7 (3 out of 10 wins versus 7 out of 10 wins for sides).
- A scenario has sophisticated rules such as:
-- Japanese Imperial Army rules
-- Marines rules.
-- Commissar chip rules.
-- Blitz rules.
-- And so on (the list of rules affecting the tag can be configured and adjusted).

Once a scenario has an 'Expert Scenario' tag assigned to it, the following is true:

- When a player selects a scenario to play, they can see the tag and explore the meaning of it by for example clicking on info icon that explains the reason behind the tag.
- When accepting a table with a tough scenario, a new player (as defined for example as a player with less than 20 games played) is shown a warning message that reads something like this:

'Hey commander! You are about to play an expert scenario. That means that this scenario either has specific rules that enahnce gameplay or is very tough to win for one of the sides. You are still a novice player and choosing this scenario could be quite challenging for you especially against a stronger opponent and might prevent you from enjoying the play in full. Are you sure you want to continue?'

While this warning could cut down the number of games played due to scaring off some unsure players, it could also cut down on the number of poorly experienced plays and therefore increase the overall satisfaction with the game and presumably increase new players to experienced players convrsion rate.

• Quel est votre navigateur ?

• Qu'affichait l'écran lorsque vous avez été bloqué(e) (Un écran vierge ? Une partie de l'interface du jeu ? Un message d'erreur ?)

There are scenarios that make it very hard for new players to learn to enjoy the game fully because they are unlucky to choose the scenario that is better fit for an expert player. As a common result - a new player judges the game based on their poor experience of their first play of a very tough scenario that they are ill equiped to play, let alone win and to fully enjoy the playing experience.

There are two reasons for this to happen:

1. The scenario pertains to an expansion with sophisticated rules that are not very obvious (for example, Pacific scenario rules of extra dice for Japanes infantry unit in full strength and their ability to compbat close quarters even after a 2hex move, extra unit to command for Marines rule, Commissar chip rule for Soviet scenarios - these can make a new player's experience miserable if they do not know yet what they are up against).
2. Some scenarios, even without sophisticated rules, are built to challenge expert players. A good examples are First Assualt Wave and Sidi Rezegh Airfield. These two scenarios offer very poor winning chances for allies.

A common result of a new player exposed to such scenarios, especially when playing against a much stronger and more experience opponent, is a humiliating defeat that could upset a new player very much and lead her to believe that the game is rigged and bad in general. Hence poor conversion.

On the contrary, should a new player build their experience up by playing enough games on either basic scenarios (i.e. that do not have sophisticated rules on them) or scenarios that offer a balanced win-lose ratio, they can enjoy their play more while learning the ropes and maturing to be challenged by tougher scenarios when the time comes.

Solution

Mark up tough scenarios with 'Expert Scenario' tag that can be assigned to a scenario either manually by the game moderator or based on automatic rules such as:

- The win-lose ratio is worse than for example 3:7 (3 out of 10 wins versus 7 out of 10 wins for sides).
- A scenario has sophisticated rules such as:
-- Japanese Imperial Army rules
-- Marines rules.
-- Commissar chip rules.
-- Blitz rules.
-- And so on (the list of rules affecting the tag can be configured and adjusted).

Once a scenario has an 'Expert Scenario' tag assigned to it, the following is true:

- When a player selects a scenario to play, they can see the tag and explore the meaning of it by for example clicking on info icon that explains the reason behind the tag.
- When accepting a table with a tough scenario, a new player (as defined for example as a player with less than 20 games played) is shown a warning message that reads something like this:

'Hey commander! You are about to play an expert scenario. That means that this scenario either has specific rules that enahnce gameplay or is very tough to win for one of the sides. You are still a novice player and choosing this scenario could be quite challenging for you especially against a stronger opponent and might prevent you from enjoying the play in full. Are you sure you want to continue?'

While this warning could cut down the number of games played due to scaring off some unsure players, it could also cut down on the number of poorly experienced plays and therefore increase the overall satisfaction with the game and presumably increase new players to experienced players convrsion rate.

• Quel est votre navigateur ?

• Quelle partie des règles n'a pas été respectée par l'adaptation BGA ?

There are scenarios that make it very hard for new players to learn to enjoy the game fully because they are unlucky to choose the scenario that is better fit for an expert player. As a common result - a new player judges the game based on their poor experience of their first play of a very tough scenario that they are ill equiped to play, let alone win and to fully enjoy the playing experience.

There are two reasons for this to happen:

1. The scenario pertains to an expansion with sophisticated rules that are not very obvious (for example, Pacific scenario rules of extra dice for Japanes infantry unit in full strength and their ability to compbat close quarters even after a 2hex move, extra unit to command for Marines rule, Commissar chip rule for Soviet scenarios - these can make a new player's experience miserable if they do not know yet what they are up against).
2. Some scenarios, even without sophisticated rules, are built to challenge expert players. A good examples are First Assualt Wave and Sidi Rezegh Airfield. These two scenarios offer very poor winning chances for allies.

A common result of a new player exposed to such scenarios, especially when playing against a much stronger and more experience opponent, is a humiliating defeat that could upset a new player very much and lead her to believe that the game is rigged and bad in general. Hence poor conversion.

On the contrary, should a new player build their experience up by playing enough games on either basic scenarios (i.e. that do not have sophisticated rules on them) or scenarios that offer a balanced win-lose ratio, they can enjoy their play more while learning the ropes and maturing to be challenged by tougher scenarios when the time comes.

Solution

Mark up tough scenarios with 'Expert Scenario' tag that can be assigned to a scenario either manually by the game moderator or based on automatic rules such as:

- The win-lose ratio is worse than for example 3:7 (3 out of 10 wins versus 7 out of 10 wins for sides).
- A scenario has sophisticated rules such as:
-- Japanese Imperial Army rules
-- Marines rules.
-- Commissar chip rules.
-- Blitz rules.
-- And so on (the list of rules affecting the tag can be configured and adjusted).

Once a scenario has an 'Expert Scenario' tag assigned to it, the following is true:

- When a player selects a scenario to play, they can see the tag and explore the meaning of it by for example clicking on info icon that explains the reason behind the tag.
- When accepting a table with a tough scenario, a new player (as defined for example as a player with less than 20 games played) is shown a warning message that reads something like this:

'Hey commander! You are about to play an expert scenario. That means that this scenario either has specific rules that enahnce gameplay or is very tough to win for one of the sides. You are still a novice player and choosing this scenario could be quite challenging for you especially against a stronger opponent and might prevent you from enjoying the play in full. Are you sure you want to continue?'

While this warning could cut down the number of games played due to scaring off some unsure players, it could also cut down on the number of poorly experienced plays and therefore increase the overall satisfaction with the game and presumably increase new players to experienced players convrsion rate.

• La violation de règle est-elle visible dans le replay de la partie ? Si oui, à quel numéro de coup ?

• Quel est votre navigateur ?

• Quelle action de jeu vouliez-vous faire ?

There are scenarios that make it very hard for new players to learn to enjoy the game fully because they are unlucky to choose the scenario that is better fit for an expert player. As a common result - a new player judges the game based on their poor experience of their first play of a very tough scenario that they are ill equiped to play, let alone win and to fully enjoy the playing experience.

There are two reasons for this to happen:

1. The scenario pertains to an expansion with sophisticated rules that are not very obvious (for example, Pacific scenario rules of extra dice for Japanes infantry unit in full strength and their ability to compbat close quarters even after a 2hex move, extra unit to command for Marines rule, Commissar chip rule for Soviet scenarios - these can make a new player's experience miserable if they do not know yet what they are up against).
2. Some scenarios, even without sophisticated rules, are built to challenge expert players. A good examples are First Assualt Wave and Sidi Rezegh Airfield. These two scenarios offer very poor winning chances for allies.

A common result of a new player exposed to such scenarios, especially when playing against a much stronger and more experience opponent, is a humiliating defeat that could upset a new player very much and lead her to believe that the game is rigged and bad in general. Hence poor conversion.

On the contrary, should a new player build their experience up by playing enough games on either basic scenarios (i.e. that do not have sophisticated rules on them) or scenarios that offer a balanced win-lose ratio, they can enjoy their play more while learning the ropes and maturing to be challenged by tougher scenarios when the time comes.

Solution

Mark up tough scenarios with 'Expert Scenario' tag that can be assigned to a scenario either manually by the game moderator or based on automatic rules such as:

- The win-lose ratio is worse than for example 3:7 (3 out of 10 wins versus 7 out of 10 wins for sides).
- A scenario has sophisticated rules such as:
-- Japanese Imperial Army rules
-- Marines rules.
-- Commissar chip rules.
-- Blitz rules.
-- And so on (the list of rules affecting the tag can be configured and adjusted).

Once a scenario has an 'Expert Scenario' tag assigned to it, the following is true:

- When a player selects a scenario to play, they can see the tag and explore the meaning of it by for example clicking on info icon that explains the reason behind the tag.
- When accepting a table with a tough scenario, a new player (as defined for example as a player with less than 20 games played) is shown a warning message that reads something like this:

'Hey commander! You are about to play an expert scenario. That means that this scenario either has specific rules that enahnce gameplay or is very tough to win for one of the sides. You are still a novice player and choosing this scenario could be quite challenging for you especially against a stronger opponent and might prevent you from enjoying the play in full. Are you sure you want to continue?'

While this warning could cut down the number of games played due to scaring off some unsure players, it could also cut down on the number of poorly experienced plays and therefore increase the overall satisfaction with the game and presumably increase new players to experienced players convrsion rate.

• Qu'avez-vous essayé de faire pour déclencher cette action de jeu ?

• Que s'est-il passé lorsque vous avez essayé de faire cela (message d'erreur, message dans la barre d'état du jeu...) ?

• Quel est votre navigateur ?

• À quelle étape de la partie le problème est-il apparu ? Quelles instructions le jeu affichait-il ?

There are scenarios that make it very hard for new players to learn to enjoy the game fully because they are unlucky to choose the scenario that is better fit for an expert player. As a common result - a new player judges the game based on their poor experience of their first play of a very tough scenario that they are ill equiped to play, let alone win and to fully enjoy the playing experience.

There are two reasons for this to happen:

1. The scenario pertains to an expansion with sophisticated rules that are not very obvious (for example, Pacific scenario rules of extra dice for Japanes infantry unit in full strength and their ability to compbat close quarters even after a 2hex move, extra unit to command for Marines rule, Commissar chip rule for Soviet scenarios - these can make a new player's experience miserable if they do not know yet what they are up against).
2. Some scenarios, even without sophisticated rules, are built to challenge expert players. A good examples are First Assualt Wave and Sidi Rezegh Airfield. These two scenarios offer very poor winning chances for allies.

A common result of a new player exposed to such scenarios, especially when playing against a much stronger and more experience opponent, is a humiliating defeat that could upset a new player very much and lead her to believe that the game is rigged and bad in general. Hence poor conversion.

On the contrary, should a new player build their experience up by playing enough games on either basic scenarios (i.e. that do not have sophisticated rules on them) or scenarios that offer a balanced win-lose ratio, they can enjoy their play more while learning the ropes and maturing to be challenged by tougher scenarios when the time comes.

Solution

Mark up tough scenarios with 'Expert Scenario' tag that can be assigned to a scenario either manually by the game moderator or based on automatic rules such as:

- The win-lose ratio is worse than for example 3:7 (3 out of 10 wins versus 7 out of 10 wins for sides).
- A scenario has sophisticated rules such as:
-- Japanese Imperial Army rules
-- Marines rules.
-- Commissar chip rules.
-- Blitz rules.
-- And so on (the list of rules affecting the tag can be configured and adjusted).

Once a scenario has an 'Expert Scenario' tag assigned to it, the following is true:

- When a player selects a scenario to play, they can see the tag and explore the meaning of it by for example clicking on info icon that explains the reason behind the tag.
- When accepting a table with a tough scenario, a new player (as defined for example as a player with less than 20 games played) is shown a warning message that reads something like this:

'Hey commander! You are about to play an expert scenario. That means that this scenario either has specific rules that enahnce gameplay or is very tough to win for one of the sides. You are still a novice player and choosing this scenario could be quite challenging for you especially against a stronger opponent and might prevent you from enjoying the play in full. Are you sure you want to continue?'

While this warning could cut down the number of games played due to scaring off some unsure players, it could also cut down on the number of poorly experienced plays and therefore increase the overall satisfaction with the game and presumably increase new players to experienced players convrsion rate.

• Que s'est-il passé lorsque vous avez essayé de faire cette action de jeu (message d'erreur, message dans la barre d'état du jeu...) ?

• Quel est votre navigateur ?

• Veuillez décrire le problème d'affichage. Si vous disposez d'une impression écran du bug (bonne pratique), vous pouvez utiliser le service d'hébergement de votre choix (snipboard.io par exemple) pour l'uploader et copier/coller le lien ici.

There are scenarios that make it very hard for new players to learn to enjoy the game fully because they are unlucky to choose the scenario that is better fit for an expert player. As a common result - a new player judges the game based on their poor experience of their first play of a very tough scenario that they are ill equiped to play, let alone win and to fully enjoy the playing experience.

There are two reasons for this to happen:

1. The scenario pertains to an expansion with sophisticated rules that are not very obvious (for example, Pacific scenario rules of extra dice for Japanes infantry unit in full strength and their ability to compbat close quarters even after a 2hex move, extra unit to command for Marines rule, Commissar chip rule for Soviet scenarios - these can make a new player's experience miserable if they do not know yet what they are up against).
2. Some scenarios, even without sophisticated rules, are built to challenge expert players. A good examples are First Assualt Wave and Sidi Rezegh Airfield. These two scenarios offer very poor winning chances for allies.

A common result of a new player exposed to such scenarios, especially when playing against a much stronger and more experience opponent, is a humiliating defeat that could upset a new player very much and lead her to believe that the game is rigged and bad in general. Hence poor conversion.

On the contrary, should a new player build their experience up by playing enough games on either basic scenarios (i.e. that do not have sophisticated rules on them) or scenarios that offer a balanced win-lose ratio, they can enjoy their play more while learning the ropes and maturing to be challenged by tougher scenarios when the time comes.

Solution

Mark up tough scenarios with 'Expert Scenario' tag that can be assigned to a scenario either manually by the game moderator or based on automatic rules such as:

- The win-lose ratio is worse than for example 3:7 (3 out of 10 wins versus 7 out of 10 wins for sides).
- A scenario has sophisticated rules such as:
-- Japanese Imperial Army rules
-- Marines rules.
-- Commissar chip rules.
-- Blitz rules.
-- And so on (the list of rules affecting the tag can be configured and adjusted).

Once a scenario has an 'Expert Scenario' tag assigned to it, the following is true:

- When a player selects a scenario to play, they can see the tag and explore the meaning of it by for example clicking on info icon that explains the reason behind the tag.
- When accepting a table with a tough scenario, a new player (as defined for example as a player with less than 20 games played) is shown a warning message that reads something like this:

'Hey commander! You are about to play an expert scenario. That means that this scenario either has specific rules that enahnce gameplay or is very tough to win for one of the sides. You are still a novice player and choosing this scenario could be quite challenging for you especially against a stronger opponent and might prevent you from enjoying the play in full. Are you sure you want to continue?'

While this warning could cut down the number of games played due to scaring off some unsure players, it could also cut down on the number of poorly experienced plays and therefore increase the overall satisfaction with the game and presumably increase new players to experienced players convrsion rate.

• Quel est votre navigateur ?

• SVP copiez / collez ici le texte affiché en anglais au lieu de votre langue. Si vous disposez d'une impression écran du bug (bonne pratique), vous pouvez utiliser le service d'hébergement de votre choix (snipboard.io par exemple) pour l'uploader et copier/coller le lien ici. Ce texte est-il disponible dans le système de traduction ? Si oui, a-t-il été traduit depuis plus de 24 heures ?

There are scenarios that make it very hard for new players to learn to enjoy the game fully because they are unlucky to choose the scenario that is better fit for an expert player. As a common result - a new player judges the game based on their poor experience of their first play of a very tough scenario that they are ill equiped to play, let alone win and to fully enjoy the playing experience.

There are two reasons for this to happen:

1. The scenario pertains to an expansion with sophisticated rules that are not very obvious (for example, Pacific scenario rules of extra dice for Japanes infantry unit in full strength and their ability to compbat close quarters even after a 2hex move, extra unit to command for Marines rule, Commissar chip rule for Soviet scenarios - these can make a new player's experience miserable if they do not know yet what they are up against).
2. Some scenarios, even without sophisticated rules, are built to challenge expert players. A good examples are First Assualt Wave and Sidi Rezegh Airfield. These two scenarios offer very poor winning chances for allies.

A common result of a new player exposed to such scenarios, especially when playing against a much stronger and more experience opponent, is a humiliating defeat that could upset a new player very much and lead her to believe that the game is rigged and bad in general. Hence poor conversion.

On the contrary, should a new player build their experience up by playing enough games on either basic scenarios (i.e. that do not have sophisticated rules on them) or scenarios that offer a balanced win-lose ratio, they can enjoy their play more while learning the ropes and maturing to be challenged by tougher scenarios when the time comes.

Solution

Mark up tough scenarios with 'Expert Scenario' tag that can be assigned to a scenario either manually by the game moderator or based on automatic rules such as:

- The win-lose ratio is worse than for example 3:7 (3 out of 10 wins versus 7 out of 10 wins for sides).
- A scenario has sophisticated rules such as:
-- Japanese Imperial Army rules
-- Marines rules.
-- Commissar chip rules.
-- Blitz rules.
-- And so on (the list of rules affecting the tag can be configured and adjusted).

Once a scenario has an 'Expert Scenario' tag assigned to it, the following is true:

- When a player selects a scenario to play, they can see the tag and explore the meaning of it by for example clicking on info icon that explains the reason behind the tag.
- When accepting a table with a tough scenario, a new player (as defined for example as a player with less than 20 games played) is shown a warning message that reads something like this:

'Hey commander! You are about to play an expert scenario. That means that this scenario either has specific rules that enahnce gameplay or is very tough to win for one of the sides. You are still a novice player and choosing this scenario could be quite challenging for you especially against a stronger opponent and might prevent you from enjoying the play in full. Are you sure you want to continue?'

While this warning could cut down the number of games played due to scaring off some unsure players, it could also cut down on the number of poorly experienced plays and therefore increase the overall satisfaction with the game and presumably increase new players to experienced players convrsion rate.

• Quel est votre navigateur ?

• Merci d'expliquer votre suggestion de manière précise et concise, de façon à ce qu'il soit aussi simple que possible de comprendre ce que vous voulez dire.

There are scenarios that make it very hard for new players to learn to enjoy the game fully because they are unlucky to choose the scenario that is better fit for an expert player. As a common result - a new player judges the game based on their poor experience of their first play of a very tough scenario that they are ill equiped to play, let alone win and to fully enjoy the playing experience.

There are two reasons for this to happen:

1. The scenario pertains to an expansion with sophisticated rules that are not very obvious (for example, Pacific scenario rules of extra dice for Japanes infantry unit in full strength and their ability to compbat close quarters even after a 2hex move, extra unit to command for Marines rule, Commissar chip rule for Soviet scenarios - these can make a new player's experience miserable if they do not know yet what they are up against).
2. Some scenarios, even without sophisticated rules, are built to challenge expert players. A good examples are First Assualt Wave and Sidi Rezegh Airfield. These two scenarios offer very poor winning chances for allies.

A common result of a new player exposed to such scenarios, especially when playing against a much stronger and more experience opponent, is a humiliating defeat that could upset a new player very much and lead her to believe that the game is rigged and bad in general. Hence poor conversion.

On the contrary, should a new player build their experience up by playing enough games on either basic scenarios (i.e. that do not have sophisticated rules on them) or scenarios that offer a balanced win-lose ratio, they can enjoy their play more while learning the ropes and maturing to be challenged by tougher scenarios when the time comes.

Solution

Mark up tough scenarios with 'Expert Scenario' tag that can be assigned to a scenario either manually by the game moderator or based on automatic rules such as:

- The win-lose ratio is worse than for example 3:7 (3 out of 10 wins versus 7 out of 10 wins for sides).
- A scenario has sophisticated rules such as:
-- Japanese Imperial Army rules
-- Marines rules.
-- Commissar chip rules.
-- Blitz rules.
-- And so on (the list of rules affecting the tag can be configured and adjusted).

Once a scenario has an 'Expert Scenario' tag assigned to it, the following is true:

- When a player selects a scenario to play, they can see the tag and explore the meaning of it by for example clicking on info icon that explains the reason behind the tag.
- When accepting a table with a tough scenario, a new player (as defined for example as a player with less than 20 games played) is shown a warning message that reads something like this:

'Hey commander! You are about to play an expert scenario. That means that this scenario either has specific rules that enahnce gameplay or is very tough to win for one of the sides. You are still a novice player and choosing this scenario could be quite challenging for you especially against a stronger opponent and might prevent you from enjoying the play in full. Are you sure you want to continue?'

While this warning could cut down the number of games played due to scaring off some unsure players, it could also cut down on the number of poorly experienced plays and therefore increase the overall satisfaction with the game and presumably increase new players to experienced players convrsion rate.

• Quel est votre navigateur ?