Tous les rapports
Rapports de bug sur Les Loups et l'Agneau
#103875: "2-round game with switching sides?"
implemented: Cette suggestion a été implémentée
2
Quel est le sujet de ce rapport ?
Que s'est-il passé ? Merci de choisir ci-dessous
Suggestion : à mon avis, la modification suivante améliorerait grandement l'implémentation du jeu
Description détaillée
• Merci d'expliquer votre suggestion de manière précise et concise, de façon à ce qu'il soit aussi simple que possible de comprendre ce que vous voulez dire.
Currently, most combinatorial games on BGA are either not strongly solved (e.g. Chess, Checkers, invented games, and etc.), solved but results in a draw with perfect play (e.g. Reversi, Nine Men's Morris, Quarto, etc.), or solved but negates the player position advantage by employing pie rule or its variant (e.g. Gomoku, Pente, etc.).
However, this game is an asymmetric combinatorial game and is described as a solved game (wolves win with perfect play).
Above a certain level of skills, a single round game is likely to depend on the player position.
So, implementing a 2-round mode where players play each side once might be a good idea.• Quel est votre navigateur ?
Google Chrome v119
Historique des rapports de bug
13 nov. 2023 20:56 • ufm • Cette suggestion n'a pas encore été analysée par les développeurs:
Some asymmetric games on BGA also have this option (e.g. Memoir '44, Jekyll vs. Hyde, etc.).
13 nov. 2023 20:59 • ufm • Cette suggestion n'a pas encore été analysée par les développeurs:
Also, the tiebreaker will be needed to prevent endless waves of 1:1 ties.
14 nov. 2023 14:35 • Jonathan2004 • Les développeurs aimeraient plus d'informations à propos de cette suggestion:
Thank you for your interest ;)
I think this is a good suggestion.
For now I think I only played 2 games with that kind of 2 round mode :
-Memoir'44 : the game rules state which players get a given number of points in each round, so we understand who is the winner
-Luck Numbers : (not the same kind of solvable game though) again the game rules state which player is the winner in 'tournament' mode
So we need to find a good way to find the winner in this game, do you think the lesser number of moves is enough ?
For example today I see those 2 tables with the same players :
- boardgamearena.com/table?table=439270363 megumaru wins in 17 moves
- boardgamearena.com/table?table=439275913 Askeladdd wins in 7 moves
=> Askeladdd should be declared winner of this 2 round game ?
I think this is a good suggestion.
For now I think I only played 2 games with that kind of 2 round mode :
-Memoir'44 : the game rules state which players get a given number of points in each round, so we understand who is the winner
-Luck Numbers : (not the same kind of solvable game though) again the game rules state which player is the winner in 'tournament' mode
So we need to find a good way to find the winner in this game, do you think the lesser number of moves is enough ?
For example today I see those 2 tables with the same players :
- boardgamearena.com/table?table=439270363 megumaru wins in 17 moves
- boardgamearena.com/table?table=439275913 Askeladdd wins in 7 moves
=> Askeladdd should be declared winner of this 2 round game ?
14 nov. 2023 14:45 • ufm • Les développeurs aimeraient plus d'informations à propos de cette suggestion:
Probably. Winning time as the tiebreaker makes sense.
19 nov. 2023 11:05 • Jonathan2004 • Les développeurs reconnaissent que c'est une bonne idée et ont l'intention d'y travailler:
I am working on it...
19 nov. 2023 19:50 • Jonathan2004 • Cette suggestion a été implémentée:
Added in today's version 231119-1936.
Ajouter à ce rapport
Veuillez ajouter ici toute information qui semble pertinente pour reproduire ce bug ou comprendre votre suggestion :
- Un autre n° de table / n° de coup
- Appuyer sur F5 a-t-il résolu le problème ?
- Le problème est-il apparu plusieurs fois ? À chaque fois ? Aléatoirement ?
- Si vous avez une capture d'écran de ce bug (pensez-y !), vous pouvez utiliser Imgur.com pour la télécharger et copier-coller le lien ici.
